Give a distributed field team one place to prepare questionnaires, follow incoming records and investigate collection problems. Prepare published form packages for selected devices, inspect synchronization health and connect activity summaries to the actual submissions. Use structured questionnaires for research visits and site assessments, then help supervisors decide where to focus their next review or follow-up.
Different questionnaire copies and separate progress updates make a collection round difficult to coordinate.
Prepare identified published versions and follow recorded arrivals and form activity in the project.
A total response count does not show which records or synchronization problems need attention.
Open the submissions behind the activity view and investigate quality findings or device conflicts.
Collection, device diagnostics and review decisions are spread across tools and handoffs.
Keep prepared devices, collection health, review work and reporting connected to the same study.
Use these existing workflows to connect your team’s task with a result it can review and use.
Publish and test the questionnaire, give colleagues appropriate access and prepare form packages for the devices selected for the study.
Help the team work from a known questionnaire version, including prepared collection when connectivity is unreliable.
Configure a consistent assessment form with the observations, photographs and location fields your team needs. Collect records from authorised colleagues and inspect the supporting submissions during review.
Compare recorded site conditions using agreed questions and trace each finding to the supplied evidence.
Inspect recorded arrivals, form activity and review states. Open the rows behind a summary when a supervisor needs more context.
Use the incoming evidence to decide which collection or review work needs follow-up.
Inspect registered-device diagnostics and synchronization results. Review conflicts and record the selected resolution when the device reconnects.
Keep interrupted collection and unresolved conflicts visible to the people responsible for recovery.
Generate a review sample prioritised by retained quality-issue risk, carry out the check and record an attributed outcome for the selected submission.
Document which responses were checked and the evidence behind the supervisor decision.
Your workflow brings analysis and quality review together in the same workspace. Match the published plan allowances and optional AI credits to the work your team needs.
Ask questions across approved fields, compare relevant groups and organise written responses. Review field meanings, filters, statistical assumptions and supporting answers, then save analyses for the next team discussion.
Review approved collection fields, compare recorded activity and organise open responses from the field. Use optional AI assistance to explore questions while checking the source records and scope.
Provider-assisted dataset questions require workspace enablement, a configured provider, permission and credits. Review the analysis and sampled text themes before using them in a decision.
Investigate configured quality findings, assign follow-up and record review decisions. Apply approved corrections in tracked batches, retain the original submissions and reconsider derived corrections through rollback.
Follow configured quality findings across the study, assign investigation and retain corrective decisions. Use recorded issue risk to prioritise back-check work and document the outcome.
Quality flags guide investigation and depend on the available collection metadata. Corrected values are retained separately; submission exports currently contain the original answers.
Coordinated fieldwork needs capacity for colleagues, active studies, accepted responses and collected media. Compare Team for your actual collection workload and keep field preparation, review and reporting in the same workspace. Your organisation supplies the field team; the subscription supplies the tools it uses to manage the evidence.
Loading published plan prices…
Use these measures to evaluate your own improvement. They are not promised customer results.
Pilot the form, publish the reviewed version and test the selected devices, storage and packages before the field team starts.
Give colleagues project access, collect responses and inspect arrivals, review states and device diagnostics when connectivity returns.
Review quality findings and conflicts, record back-check decisions and analyse approved records with optional AI assistance before preparing the research handoff.
Offline workflows need advance device and browser testing and a connection to synchronize. Conflict decisions retain history and do not automatically rewrite response data. Quality signals and risk-based back-checks do not prove fraud or replace a sampling design. Supplied location and photographs do not independently verify a visit or certify compliance. Jorip does not supply enumerators, respondents or automatic field dispatch.
Choose the service, compare the current plan and test the workflow with your team.
Discuss your team’s requirementsBuild a form for your next survey, application or feedback request. Collect responses in one workspace and give your team a clear place to review them.